Enoxaparin monotherapy without oral anticoagulation to treat acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism

Summary

Conventional anticoagulation for symptomatic pulmonary embolism consists of continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin as a “bridge” to oral anticoagulation. This strategy requires 5 days or more of intravenous heparin while oral vitamin K antagonists gradually achieve a therapeutic effect. Oral vitamin K antagonists require frequent blood testing to optimize dosing, and their interactions with other medications and foods make regulation difficult. Therefore we tested a different approach to therapy: long-term enoxaparin monotherapy.

We randomized 60 symptomatic pulmonary embolism patients in a 2:1 ratio to 90 days of enoxaparin as monotherapy without warfarin (N=40) or to intravenous unfractionated heparin as a “bridge” to warfarin, target INR 2.0-3.0 (N=20). Enoxaparin patients received 1 mg/kg twice daily for 14 days during the acute phase followed by randomized assignment during the chronic phase to 1.0 mg/kg vs. 1.5 mg/kg once daily.

In an intention-to-treat analysis, 3 of the 40 enoxaparin patients developed recurrent venous thromboembolism compared with 0 of 20 standard therapy patients (p = 0.54). One of the 40 enoxaparin patients had a major hemorrhagic complication compared with 2 of the 20 standard therapy patients (p = 0.26). Median hospital length of stay was shorter with enoxaparin compared to standard therapy (4 vs. 6 days) (p = 0.001). Following our study we can conclude that extended 3-month treatment with enoxaparin as monotherapy for symptomatic, acute pulmonary embolism is feasible and warrants further study in a large clinical trial.

Keywords

Pulmonary embolism - thrombosis - anticoagulation - low molecular weight heparin - enoxaparin

• References

• 1 Hyers TM, Agnelli G, Hull RD. et al. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease. Chest 2001; 119 (Suppl. 01) Suppl 176S-93S.
• 2 White RH, Beyth RJ, Zhou H. et al. Major bleeding after hospitalization for deep-venous thrombosis. Am J Med 1999; 107: 414-24.
• 3 Weitz JI. Low-molecular-weight heparins. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 688-98.
• 4 Gould MK, Dembitzer AD, Doyle RL, Hastie TJ, Garber AM. Low-molecular-weight heparins compared with unfractionated heparin for treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130: 800-9.
• 5 Meyer G, Marjanovic Z, Valcke J. et al. Comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin for the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: a randomized controlled study. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 1729-35.
• 6 Wolfe MW, Lee RT, Feldstein ML. et al Prognostic significance of right ventricular hypokinesis and perfusion lung scan defects in pulmonary embolism. Am Heart J 1994; 127: 1371-5.
• 7 Goldhaber SZ. Echocardiography in the management of pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136: 691-700.
• 8 Grifoni S, Olivotto I, Cecchini P. et al. Short-term clinical outcome of patients with acute pulmonary embolism, normal blood pressure, and echocardiographic right ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 2000; 101: 2817-22.
• 9 Levine M, Gent M, Hirsh J, Leclerc J, Anderson D, Weitz J. et al. A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin administered primarily at home with unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital for proximal deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 677-81.
• 10 Pini M, Aiello S, Manotti C. et al. Low molecular weight heparin versus warfarin in the prevention of recurrences after deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1994; 72: 191-7.
• 11 Gonzalez-Fajardo JA, Arreba E, Castrodeza J. et al Venographic comparison of subcutaneous low-molecular weight heparin with oral anticoagulant therapy in the long-term treatment of deep venous thrombosis. J Vasc Surg 1999; 30: 283-92.
• 12 Veiga F, Escriba A, Maluenda MP. et al. Low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin) versus oral anticoagulant therapy (acenocoumarol) in the long-term treatment of deep venous thrombosis in the elderly: a randomized trial. Thromb Haemost 2000; 84: 559-64.
• 13 Lopaciuk S, Bielska-Falda H, Noszczyk W. et al. Low molecular weight heparin versus acenocoumarol in the secondary prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1999; 81: 26-31.
• 14 Das SK, Cohen AT, Edmondson RA. et al. Low-molecular-weight heparin versus warfar-in for prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism: a randomized trial. World J Surg 1996; 20: 521-6.
• 15 Murin S, Romano PS, White RH. Comparison of outcomes after hospitalization for deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost 2002; 88: 407-14.